Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(6): e435-e442, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323125

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 50 million US adults experience chronic tinnitus, yet search behaviors and topics of concern to these patients have not been investigated on a national level. STUDY DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: Online database and tertiary otology clinic. PATIENTS: Nationwide and institutional samples. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A search engine optimization tool was utilized to extract metadata on "People Also Ask" (PAA) questions pertaining to tinnitus. Website quality was assessed using JAMA benchmark criteria. Search volume trends were investigated along with institutional-level data on tinnitus incidence. RESULTS: Of the 500 PAA questions assessed, the majority (54.0%) contained value-type content. The most popular question categories pertained to tinnitus treatment (29.3%), alternative treatment approaches (21.5%), technical details (16.9%), and timeline of symptoms (13.4%). Patients were most interested in treatment with wearable masking devices and most commonly searched for tinnitus as being attributable to a neurologic etiology. Online searches pertaining to unilateral tinnitus symptoms have increased >3-fold since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Likewise, review of patient encounters at our tertiary otology clinic revealed a nearly 2-fold increase in tinnitus consultations since 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Topics of interest and concern identified herein may inform the development of patient education materials and help guide clinical practice. Online search data suggest an increase in tinnitus searches since the onset of COVID-19, which did correlate clinically with an increase in tinnitus consultations at our institution.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Aids , Tinnitus , Adult , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , Tinnitus/epidemiology , Tinnitus/therapy
2.
British Journal of Healthcare Management ; 27(9):212-213, 2021.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1405550
4.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 43(4): 714-722, 2021 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1123349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We describe the epidemiological trends and report and review the public health restrictions implemented during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland. METHODS: The study reviewed confirmed cases of COVID-19 notified from 1 March to 18 July 2020. Data were obtained from the national COVID-19 Data Hub, the National Health Protection Surveillance Centre, the National Contact Management Programme and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. RESULTS: A total of 25 617 cases were notified during the study period. Weekly cases and deaths peaked in mid-April 2020 at 5701 and 316, respectively. Mean number of close contacts per case was lowest at 0.7 in April, rising to 6.6 by July. Outbreak settings shifted from travel and workplace in March, to healthcare in April. Restrictions implemented on 12 March extended to full lockdown on 27 March. Phased relaxation of restrictions commenced 18 May. Effective suppression of community transmission of COVID-19 was achieved by June 2020. CONCLUSION: Lockdown is a crude population-level restriction effective in controlling COVID-19. Phased relaxation of restrictions in Ireland, however, led to an immediate increase in mean number of contacts per case, which facilitates viral transmission unless individual-level restrictions are adhered to. This demonstrates a limitation of lockdown as a long-term mechanism of pandemic control.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL